Mentor programme for postdocs
Registration open - please see below
The mentor programme offers one-to-one feedback with experienced colleagues in the period 2025-2026. The aim is to support young researchers´ competency and career development and inspire them to a research career at UCHP, hospitals or in the industry. There are 40 mentor-mentee couples in each round.
Structure and content of the programme
The coming round of the mentor programme runs from 1 May 2025 to the end of March 2026. During this period, it is recommended that the mentor and mentee have six to ten meetings.
Mentorship pairs are put together by consultant Lisa Ott based on individual mentee needs and mentor experience and knowledge. It is important to ensure a certain organisational distance between the mentee and mentor, and that they are not well acquainted before the mentorship is established. It is a requirement that mentees participate in a half-day course on the mentor-mentee roles (week 10 and 11). The course is conducted by Lisa Ott who has extensive experience with mentoring in general and for UCPH.
New mentors can sign up for a half-day course or have an individual meeting with Lisa Ott (week 11).
1 May 2025 from 15.30-17.00 there will be a joint kick-off workshop and in November 2025 a second joint workshop will be held after the mid-term evaluation to provide new insights and inspire the participants to structure and make the most of the remaining part of the programme.
Mentee:
Participation requires employment as a postdoc at the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences.
Please note that we cannot guarantee that there are mentors to all who register as the programme requires a good match.
What´s in it for you?
Quote experienced mentor Professor Nicole Schmitt, Department of Biomedical Sciences: “You may ask yourself how you should find time in your busy schedule for being a mentor? A very relevant question - what's in it for me? Actually a lot. I am a regular mentor in the UCPH programme for assistant professors. Seeing the workplace through the eyes of the mentees made me reflect on my own leadership approaches and gave me other perspectives on UCPH as an organization. Realizing that my questions helped the mentees to develop was very rewarding, both as a professional and as a person. We attend many meetings - these ones really have an impact."
Quote Assistant Professor Walden Emil Bjørn-Yoshimoto, Department of Biomedical Sciences:
As mentor: “Being a mentor in the UCPH program has been an incredibly enriching experience. The process of supporting early-career researchers allowed me to better understand the evolving challenges they face and to reflect on my own professional journey. Mentorship is not about having all the answers but about listening, asking the right questions, and witnessing the mentee’s progress. This has been a very valuable learning experience for me as a mentor, and something that helps and supports my professional role outside of the mentorship program as well. To me, it has been a very meaningful way to give back to the next generation of researchers and (hopefully) contribute, in some small way, to their career development – whether by better strategizing their career path, navigating life around their career, or something in between.
As mentee: “As a postdoc, the mentorship program provided a rare opportunity to step back and focus on my personal and professional development. Through my mentor’s guidance and ability to ask many of the questions I didn’t know I needed to ask myself, I (eventually) gained clarity on navigating challenges in academia and exploring diverse career paths, as well as balancing my private life with my career aspirations. The conversations were both inspiring and practical. The practical parts are certainly easier, and the “inspirational” is where a mentor can really shine. Mine certainly did, and while the practical advice has been extremely valuable at the time, to this day I continue to reflect on some of these less practical sessions we have had. This experience not only supported my growth but also reminded me that the challenges and uncertainties we face are often shared — and surmountable.”
Sign-up here no later than 19 February 2025
Read more about the Mentor program for postdocs at Lisa Ott´s website
Selection criteria – for mentees
In case there are too many applicants we need to select only 40 mentees out of the total number of applicants by using the selection criteria below.
Selection criteria in order of priority:
1) Those who are not employed at SUND as Postdocs (These applicants will be rejected)
2) Those who are only employed at SUND for such a short time that it does not make sense. Requirements for a minimum of four months ' employment from the 1st of May. (This means that the date for the end of employment at SUND in June, July and August is not ok and that these applicants will be rejected).
3) Those who have participated in the programme before (will be put at the bottom of the waiting list)
4) Those who would be able to apply again to participate in the next round (will be put on the waiting list)
2) Those who have participated before
The fourth round with 40 matched mentors and mentees ran from 1 May 2023 to 31 March 2024.
These are some of the main topics that mentees list they have discussed with their mentors:
- Career planning, development and opportunities
- Goal and priority setting
- Aligning expectations between postdoc and supervisor
- Student supervision
- Teaching
- Networking
- Career in Academia vs. Industry – pros and cons + requirements
- How to move from academia to industry
- Work-life balance, mental health, interests, personal development
- Conflict management at work
- Grant writing and funding structure
- Application process, Cv structure and job interview tips and tricks
- Academia in Denmark
These were some of the main topics that mentors list were discussed with the mentees:
- Career opportunities, planning, development and progression
- Deciding on a career path
- Funding opportunities and grant writing
- Finding a scientific niche, building a research career in academia and getting papers published
- Postdoc vs. PI in decision to publish research
- Managing research vs. teaching/mentoring students
- Developing and strengthening networking competences and making contacts
- Academia vs. industry (pros and cons)
- Startup Biotech
- Handling many supervisors – managing different demands and aligning expectations
- Finding international postdoc positions
- Supervision of students
- Balancing work and family life
- Remaining connected to science during maternity leave and rules for maternity leave
- Managing expectations, time and workload
- Danish academia
- Resilience and optimism
- Overall the results are very positive, and most participants have a positive impression of the programme. Both mentors and mentees are generally satisfied with the mentor/mentee match, and they have both benefitted from participating. Most mentees would recommend other postdocs to participate in the programme and almost all mentors would like to be mentors another time.